|
||||
|
Login
Month Archive
Recent Visitors
sandy - Tue 17 Aug 2010 07:51 AM EDT
aden.richards - Tue 17 Aug 2010 02:38 AM EDT
ericjones - Mon 16 Aug 2010 10:11 AM EDT
henery - Wed 28 Jul 2010 08:37 AM EDT
justin.will - Wed 28 Jul 2010 08:33 AM EDT
|
Tuesday, November 2
by
mknjlaw
on Tue 02 Nov 2004 03:50 PM EST
Can retaliators bide their time to strike back? The courts don't think so. In a circumstantial evidence case of reprisal, the retaliation has to follow closely on the heels of the employee's protected activity. Osama bin Laden's admission that he attacked the World Trade Center in 2001 in retaliation for Israel's invasion of Lebanon 19 years earlier validates the advice, "Don't get angry. Get even." It also invalidates the "close temporal proximity" element of a prima facie case of reprisal based on circumstantial evidence. more »
|
|||