|
||||
|
Login
Month Archive
Recent Visitors
cdavan - Wed 25 Jun 2008 11:36 AM EDT
Katy - Tue 27 May 2008 12:39 AM EDT
Scott - Sat 26 Apr 2008 11:11 PM EDT
Retired1 - Wed 02 Apr 2008 12:57 PM EDT
DON KAISER - Wed 12 Mar 2008 10:45 PM EDT
|
Tuesday, November 2
by
mknjlaw
on Tue 02 Nov 2004 03:50 PM EST
Can retaliators bide their time to strike back? The courts don't think so. In a circumstantial evidence case of reprisal, the retaliation has to follow closely on the heels of the employee's protected activity. Osama bin Laden's admission that he attacked the World Trade Center in 2001 in retaliation for Israel's invasion of Lebanon 19 years earlier validates the advice, "Don't get angry. Get even." It also invalidates the "close temporal proximity" element of a prima facie case of reprisal based on circumstantial evidence. more »
|
|||