|
||||
|
Login
Month Archive
Recent Visitors
cdavan - Wed 06 Jan 2010 12:09 PM EST
jjpershing - Thu 17 Dec 2009 09:16 AM EST
msalik - Thu 26 Feb 2009 12:16 PM EST
DON KAISER - Fri 14 Nov 2008 11:51 PM EST
ladybontsai - Tue 29 Jul 2008 08:45 AM EDT
|
Tuesday, November 2
by
mknjlaw
on Tue 02 Nov 2004 03:50 PM EST
Can retaliators bide their time to strike back? The courts don't think so. In a circumstantial evidence case of reprisal, the retaliation has to follow closely on the heels of the employee's protected activity. Osama bin Laden's admission that he attacked the World Trade Center in 2001 in retaliation for Israel's invasion of Lebanon 19 years earlier validates the advice, "Don't get angry. Get even." It also invalidates the "close temporal proximity" element of a prima facie case of reprisal based on circumstantial evidence. more »
|
|||