|
||||
|
Login
Month Archive
Recent Visitors
DON KAISER - Thu 21 Aug 2008 05:51 PM EDT
ladybontsai - Tue 29 Jul 2008 08:45 AM EDT
cdavan - Wed 25 Jun 2008 11:36 AM EDT
Katy - Tue 27 May 2008 12:39 AM EDT
Scott - Sat 26 Apr 2008 11:11 PM EDT
|
Tuesday, November 2
by
mknjlaw
on Tue 02 Nov 2004 03:50 PM EST
Can retaliators bide their time to strike back? The courts don't think so. In a circumstantial evidence case of reprisal, the retaliation has to follow closely on the heels of the employee's protected activity. Osama bin Laden's admission that he attacked the World Trade Center in 2001 in retaliation for Israel's invasion of Lebanon 19 years earlier validates the advice, "Don't get angry. Get even." It also invalidates the "close temporal proximity" element of a prima facie case of reprisal based on circumstantial evidence. more »
|
|||